In rare disease clinical development, patient scarcity and geographical dispersion create a persistent challenge: sponsors open dozens of clinical trial sites that each manage to recruit only one or two patients over several years. But what if investigator sites could dramatically expand their geographical reach without adding burden to site personnel?
New portfolio modeling across MRN’s haematology and complement-mediated trial experience reveals that integrating Home Trial Support (HTS) fundamentally transforms rare disease trial mechanics. In Paroxysmal Nocturnal Haemoglobinuria (PNH) – the commonest of these rare complement conditions – adding HTS cuts overall recruitment time by nearly a quarter, reduces the required site footprint by approximately 15 centres, and enables up to 70% of protocol visits to take place comfortably in the patient’s home.
23%
Faster PNH Recruitment
15 Fewer
Sites Needed in PNH
~70%
Visits Delivered at Home
Why rare disease recruitment stalls – and how HTS solves it
Traditional trial setups in conditions like PNH concentrate a handful of patients per million across specialized medical centres. Sites typically see recruitment rates averaging 0.20 patients per site per month (PPM) in PNH, and as low as 0.02 to 0.06 PPM in ultra-rare hereditary conditions. Sponsors are forced to open large site networks, driving up study activation and operational costs.
Home Trial Support does not replace the investigator site; rather, it acts as an additive multiplier. By deploying dedicated research nurses to carry out protocol assessments and administer investigational products directly in the patient’s home, HTS expands each site’s catchment area. Remote and travel-constrained patients who previously could not participate can now enrol under the oversight of an established site.
“HTS is additive to a site’s recruitment capacity, not a substitute. By removing geographic barriers for distant patients, sites recruit individuals they otherwise could never reach.”
Planning rules for next-generation rare disease protocol design
Based on MRN’s cross-therapeutic delivery data across complement and rare haematology indications, clinical operations teams should incorporate five core principles during early study design:
- Model HTS as an Additive Contribution: Baseline traditional recruitment at 0.20 PPM for PNH (six-trial benchmark average) and 0.02–0.06 PPM for ultra-rare conditions. Layer HTS on top as an additive recruitment driver rather than a replacement.
- Shift Non-Fixed Assessments Out of the Clinic: Around 7 in 10 protocol visits across complement-mediated diseases can be safely delivered at home. Reserve clinic visits exclusively for equipment-fixed procedures (e.g., specialised imaging).
- Match HTS Strategy to Disease Rarity: HTS delivers the largest proportional gains in both timeline speed-up and overall study cost where baseline site recruitment is lowest. The rarer and more dispersed the patient population, the greater the transformational impact.
- Embed Home Support from Day One: Retrofitting HTS midway through recruitment captures only a fraction of its potential. To maximize site-reduction savings and speed up timelines, HTS must be offered at or before consent, prior to opening unnecessary sites.
- Utilize Dedicated Third-Party Research Nurses: Keeping the home-visit workload separate from site staff protects site capacity. Third-party nurses are sourced locally near the patient, avoiding site nurse travel burnout and maximising reach.
Impact across indications: PNH, Haemophilia B & Congenital TTP
The operational and financial impact of HTS scales dramatically as indication rarity increases:
| Indication | Baseline Rate | Speed-Up Factor | Timeline Reduction | Site Network Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNH | 0.20 PPM | 1.30x | 23% (5.5 months saved) | ~15 fewer sites required |
| Haemophilia B | Low baseline | 2.00x | 49% reduction | Near cost break-even |
| Congenital TTP | 0.02–0.06 PPM | 3.80x | 74% reduction | Cut sites from 80 to ~20 (~1/3 off cost) |
A proven track record in rare haematology & complement-mediated trials
MRN brings over a decade of hands-on delivery experience across complex haematological and complement-mediated indications, including PNH, aHUS, congenital TTP, Haemophilia B gene therapy, hereditary angioedema, multiple myeloma, and beta-thalassaemia.
- In a 20-patient, multi-country, Phase 3 congenital TTP trial, MRN research nurses executed over 700 home visits across 9 sites in 5 countries over three years, sustaining long-term participation in an ultra-rare population.
- In a 12-patient PNH programme, MRN delivered nearly 500 home visits across 6 sites in 5 countries under a single global contract.
- Across all complement and haematology indications, MRN nurses have successfully delivered 1,452 specialised protocol visits in the home.
Recruit the Patients Others Can’t Reach
Planning a trial in PNH, complement-mediated, or rare haematological diseases? MRN can model custom recruitment timelines, site footprint reductions, and cost savings for your exact protocol.
Methodology & Benchmark Reference Sources
How the Analysis Works: The analysis combines MRN’s measured delivery records with published per-site recruitment benchmarks. Baseline per-site rates were established from key landmark clinical trials in each indication. HTS contribution was quantified additively based on real-world delivery data in PNH, congenital TTP, and Haemophilia B gene therapy. Total visit feasibility calculated a measured 69% home deliverability in PNH and a house-wide benchmark of 74% across MRN’s broader therapeutic base.
Primary Published Sources:
- PNH: PEGASUS (N Engl J Med 2021;384:1028-37); Ravulizumab Study 301 & 302 (Blood 2019;133:530-549); APPLY-PNH (N Engl J Med 2024;390:994-1008); APPOINT-PNH (Lancet Haematol 2025); COMMODORE 2 (Am J Hematol 2024;99:1768-79).
- aHUS: Adult & Pediatric Ravulizumab Trials (Kidney Int 2020;97:1287-96 & 2021;100:225-37).
- TTP: HERCULES (N Engl J Med 2019;380:335-46); TITAN (N Engl J Med 2016;374:511-22); Recombinant ADAMTS13 (N Engl J Med 2024;390:1584-96).
- Myeloma & Thalassaemia: MAIA Trial (N Engl J Med 2019;380:2104-15); BELIEVE Trial (N Engl J Med 2020;382:1219-31).